USPTO serial 99281057
EARLYTOWIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLK, DANA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with EARLYTOWIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rob LeBlanc
Rob LeBlanc GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5200DALLAS, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for predicting the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier based on scoring metrics in the nature of structured questionnaire responses and correlative statistical models; Providing online non-downloadable software featuring software for generating total loss predictions for vehicles damaged by collision, flood, hail, vandalism, or other wreckage events; Providing online non-downloadable software featuring software for generating assessments of vehicle damage severity through structured inputs and delivering classification outputs for early total loss identification for use in insurance claims processing; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier or can be repaired based on scoring metrics; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier based on scoring metrics in the nature of structured questionnaire responses and correlative statistical models; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating total loss predictions for vehicles damaged by collision, flood, hail, vandalism, or other wreckage events; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating assessments of vehicle damage severity through structured inputs and delivering classification outputs for early total loss identification for use in insurance claims processing; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for generating predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier or can be repaired using scoring metrics; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for generating predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier based on scoring metrics in the nature of structured questionnaire responses and correlative statistical models; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for generating total loss predictions for vehicles damaged by collision, flood, hail, vandalism, or other wreckage events; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for generating assessments of vehicle damage severity through structured inputs and delivering classification outputs for early total loss identification for use in insurance claims processing; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to generate predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier or can be repaired based on scoring metrics; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to generate predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier based on scoring metrics in the nature of structured questionnaire responses and correlative statistical models; Providing an interactive website featuring technology for generating total loss predictions for vehicles damaged by collision, flood, hail, vandalism, or other wreckage events; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to generate assessments of vehicle damage severity through structured inputs and delivering classification outputs for early total loss identification for use in insurance claims processing; Providing online non-downloadable software featuring software for generating predictions as to the likelihood that a vehicle will be deemed a total loss by an insurance carrier or can be repaired based on scoring metrics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |