USPTO serial 99282509
STRIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Overland Park, KS, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea M. Porterfield
Andrea M. Porterfield Polsinelli PCPO Box 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Tactical robots for use in the fields of military operations, law enforcement, firefighting, security, industries handling hazardous materials and search and rescue; laboratory robots for use in the field of scientific research; tactical robots for use in military and law enforcement surveillance and reconnaissance; tactical robots for use in building and route clearance; Security surveillance robots for video and audio monitoring in industrial settings | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Remote controlled land vehicles, namely, automatic guided vehicles; Remote controlled all-terrain vehicles; Robotic transport vehicles; Robotic all-terrain vehicles (atvs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |