USPTO serial 99284945
INTELLIGENCE OS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITROS, CATHERINE SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE OS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer operating software programs using artificial intelligence (AI) for a substrate for an operating system generating cognitive function in transformer based AI systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |