USPTO serial 99284991
LUXORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, GILLIAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUXORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yoqne'am Illit, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcella Ballard
Marcella Ballard VENABLE, LLP151 West 42nd Street, 49th Fl.New York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Minimal invasive and non-invasive surgical cosmetic equipment, applicators and instruments for face tightening, contouring and skin contraction/coagulation, namely deployment of bipolar RF energy to multi-level soft tissue depths, dermal and sub-dermal zones, adipose tissue and dermal tissue | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical aesthetic treatment services, namely, treating the skin with RF energy; cosmetic medical treatment services, namely, cosmetic surgery services; minimal invasive surgical cosmetic treatment services; facial tightening treatment services, using RF energy; facial contouring treatment services using RF energy; providing medical aesthetic procedures using RF energy for treating skin; facial skin contraction treatment services using RF energy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |