USPTO serial 99287161
ONSOLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ONSOLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fuquay Varina, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay M. Brown
Jay M. Brown Brown & Brown IP Law PLLC1135 Kildaire Farm Rd., Ste 200Cary, NC 27511United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable software for managing restaurant operations; downloadable software for managing restaurant operations, namely, managing and correlating data for pricing, supply availability, supplier contact information, supply quality, supply, supply expiration, customer history and feedback, ingredient specifications, reservations, menu orders, and/or table assignments; downloadable software for updating and displaying electronic restaurant menus, downloadable software for determining preparation costs for menu items, downloadable software for determining preparation profit margins for menu items, downloadable software for communicating with restaurant customers regarding table availability and assignment, downloadable software for analyzing restaurant staff performance, downloadable software for determining restaurant staff training and discipline, downloadable software for generating advertising for restaurants, and/or downloadable software for placing orders for restaurant supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and development of computer software for managing restaurant operations; design and development of computer software for managing restaurant operations, namely, managing and correlating data for pricing, supply availability, quality, inventory, expiration, supplier information, customer history and feedback, ingredients, reservations, orders, and/or table assignments, electronic menus, preparation costs, profit margins, table availability and assignment, staff performance, staff training and discipline, advertising, and/or orders for supplies; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing restaurant operations; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for managing restaurant operations; providing on-line non-downloadable software for managing restaurant operations; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |