Drawing for SIDE HUSTLE

USPTO serial 99287247

SIDE HUSTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYCEDO, CATHERINE ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDE HUSTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEE J. EULGEN

LEE J. EULGEN NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP225 WEST RANDOLPH STREET, SUITE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Art prints; Art pictures in the nature of paintings; Art pictures in the nature of printed photographsACTIVE—
020FurnitureACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring furniture, home décor, and art; On-line retail store services featuring housewares, home decor decorative items and home furnishings; Retail store services for works of artACTIVE—
038Streaming of videos and music on the InternetACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded videos in the field of art and music via live streaming transmission services; Entertainment services, namely, art exhibitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 14, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 14, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 14, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 14, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 12, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 16, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance