Drawing for ONA

USPTO serial 99288352

ONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRENDAN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul E. Thomas

Paul E. Thomas Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPP.O. Box 10500McLean, VA 22102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sanitary napkins; Belts for sanitary napkins; Feminine hygiene pads; Sanitary pads; Sanitary tampons; Menstrual underwear; Menstruation tampons; Menstruation bandages; Breast pads; Panty shields; Panty liners; Sanitary panties; Food for infants; Liquid formula milk for infants; Baby foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance