USPTO serial 99290661
MAYDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAYDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Brunswick, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna A. Tobin
Donna A. Tobin Barry Cohen, Julie Latsko, Sonia Shariff, Nancy Frandsen1120 Avenue of the Americas4th floorNew York, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic creams for skin care; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Skin lotion; Skin cream; Beauty serums; Skin cleansers; Skin moisturizer; Skin masks; Non-medicated exfoliating preparations for skin; Self-tanning preparations; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Facial cream; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, body mists; cosmetic preparations in the form of facial sprays; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Non-medicated foot powder; Non-medicated foot lotions; Non-medicated foot cream; Non-medicated foot soaks; Non-medicated hand soaps; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Moisturizing body lotions; Body sprays; Body scrubs; Skin cleanser preparations for face and body; Body wash; Body oils; Facial oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |