USPTO serial 99291223
CART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROCCA, ALAINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seongnam-si, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAX VERN
MAX VERN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical measurement device, namely, electro-optical instruments for use in measurement of industrial components; non-medical diagnostic equipment, namely, handheld diagnostic scanners for performing automotive diagnostics; smart rings; wearable computers in the nature of smartwatches; data processing apparatus; recorded computer programs for measuring biometric information; recorded computer programs for measuring heart beat; recorded computer programs for detecting atrial fibrillation; recorded computer programs for measuring heart rate; computer monitors; data processing equipment, namely, electronic card readers, chip card readers, optical readers, smart card readers, radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers, bar code readers, magnetically encoded card readers, near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled readers; data processing equipment, namely, barcode scanners, digital input and output scanners, optical scanners; biometric scanners; none of the above in the field of augmented, virtual and mixed reality glasses and headsets, nor in the field of computer software for use in statistical analysis of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |