USPTO serial 99291341
E ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUEY,JORDAN ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036-5403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software development kits, application programming interface (API) and software components for use in developing, integrating and operating digital banking and financial services applications; downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) in the field of financial services, digital banking, payment services and other transactional services; downloadable cloud-computing software for deploying financial platforms into third-party environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Customer relationship management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Digital banking services; online banking services; digital banking payment processing, namely electronic processing of electronic payments; processing of payments payment processing services in the field of credit card, tax and insurance payments for banks; ; financial management of payments; financial services, namely, money lending; organising of debt collections in the nature of debt collection agency services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable application software for use in providing cloud computing services, namely, deploying virtual machines to a cloud computing platform, managing virtual machines on a cloud computing platform in the field of digital banking; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in the provision of financial services; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in providing digital banking services; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for conducting financial management, financial analysis, and payment processing products and services; platform as a service (Paas) services featuring computer software platforms for use in the provision of financial services; platform as a service (Paas) services featuring computer software platforms for use in providing digital banking services; platform as a service (Paas) services featuring computer software platforms for conducting financial management, financial analysis, and payment processing products and services; data migration services in the field of financial products and services; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services in the field of digital banking; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for integration of digital platforms into third-party environments in the field of digital banking; cloud-computing services, namely, cloud computing featuring software use in database management in the field of digital banking; providing virtual computer environments through cloud computing in the field of digital banking; cloud computing consulting services in the field of digital banking; design and development of operating software for accessing and using cloud computing networks in the field of digital banking; electronic monitoring of bank and credit card activity to detect fraud via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |