Drawing for TITANIUM EDGE

USPTO serial 99292436

TITANIUM EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITANIUM EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JASON M. DRANGEL

JASON M. DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 East 42nd StreetSuite 1250New York, NY 10165

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electric shavers; Non-electric shavers; Blades for shavers; Hair trimmers; Electric hair trimmers; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Blades and brushes for electric hair clippers and trimmers; Depilatory appliances; Razors; All of the foregoing containing titaniumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 9, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance