USPTO serial 99295666
VOYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boca Raton, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS B. DANELLA
Dennis B. Danella, Esq. Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP1900 Bausch & Lomb PlaceRochester, NY 14604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online web-based non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of travel and travel planning, namely, for planning trips with a chatbot experience, providing pre-built inspirational trip plans and itineraries, providing personalized information and search results related to lodging, transportation and local attractions for travel destinations, planning and making reservations and bookings for transportation, planning and making reservations and bookings for lodging, planning and making reservations and bookings for restaurants, planning and making reservations and bookings for travel activities and attractions, planning and making reservations and bookings for tours, providing geographic information, maps, map images and trip routing based on trip itinerary, generating best travel itinerary for trips based on user input, saving travel itineraries with calendar integration, and providing notifications and alerts related to travel itineraries, reservations and bookings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |