USPTO serial 99295815
HALO TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALO TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie E. Reitz
Julie E. Reitz Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AI-powered wearable electronic devices, namely, safety helmets with industrial sensors and featuring advanced positioning technology and Occupational Health and Safety features to enhance workplace safety, productivity, and decision-making in industrial settings; Downloadable AI-powered computer software platforms for use with industrial sensors, advanced positioning technology, and Occupational Health and Safety features to enhance workplace safety, productivity, and decision-making in industrial settings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, design, and developing of AI-powered wearable devices and platforms integrated with industrial sensors, advanced positioning systems, AI powered software control systems and Occupational Health and Safety features to optimize workplace safety, productivity, and decision-making in industrial environments; Providing online non-downloadable AI-powered computer software platforms for use with industrial sensors, advanced positioning technology, and Occupational Health and Safety features to enhance workplace safety, productivity, and decision-making in industrial settings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |