USPTO serial 99300015
ACCESSNSITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCESSNSITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer H Hamilton
Jennifer H Hamilton Avyno Law, PC6345 Balboa Blvd. Suite 312Encino, CA 91316United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable facilities management software to control building environment, access and security systems; Security products, namely, entry door systems comprising touch pads and security doors; Security token hardware for user authentication; Entry/exit security portal comprised of an electronic passageway equipped with biometric devices for identification verification and detection of impermissible items being carried through; Security control panels and motion detectors; Security alarm controllers; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; Closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; Security cameras; Security alarms; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, security systems; Communications servers; Computer servers; Downloadable computer software designed to be deployed on web servers for use in providing security services | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2000 |
| 042 | Design and development of home security systems; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of computer hardware, peripherals and software used for security systems, alarms, surveillance; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use to install, operate, manage and monitor security systems, alarm units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal security alarms, home surveillance systems, lighting controls and home automation devices; Engineering and system analysis in the field of home security systems; Testing of security systems | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |