Drawing for ACCESSNSITE

USPTO serial 99300015

ACCESSNSITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCESSNSITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer H Hamilton

Jennifer H Hamilton Avyno Law, PC6345 Balboa Blvd. Suite 312Encino, CA 91316United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable facilities management software to control building environment, access and security systems; Security products, namely, entry door systems comprising touch pads and security doors; Security token hardware for user authentication; Entry/exit security portal comprised of an electronic passageway equipped with biometric devices for identification verification and detection of impermissible items being carried through; Security control panels and motion detectors; Security alarm controllers; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; Closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; Security cameras; Security alarms; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, security systems; Communications servers; Computer servers; Downloadable computer software designed to be deployed on web servers for use in providing security servicesACTIVEOct 20, 2000
042Design and development of home security systems; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of computer hardware, peripherals and software used for security systems, alarms, surveillance; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use to install, operate, manage and monitor security systems, alarm units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal security alarms, home surveillance systems, lighting controls and home automation devices; Engineering and system analysis in the field of home security systems; Testing of security systemsACTIVEOct 20, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance