USPTO serial 99302338
VALAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin K. Flanagan
Justin K. Flanagan PCFB, LLC4001 South 700 East, Suite 500Salt Lake City, UT 84107United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuits for photonic computing; computer hardware, namely, optical processing units (OPUs) that use photonic integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, optical modulators in the nature of integrated circuits, and optical data processors for artificial intelligence inference and high-performance computing; computer hardware, namely, optical compute units (OCUs) that use photonic integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, optical modulators in the nature of integrated circuits, and optical data processors for artificial intelligence inference and high-performance computing; optical data processors; data processors and computing chips, namely, optical, electronic, and hybrid processors and computing chips for vector-matrix, matrix-matrix, and vector-vector computation; integrated circuits and data processors for artificial intelligence and machine learning acceleration; integrated circuits and semiconductor chips for implementing optical and hybrid computing architectures; optical modulators in the nature of integrated circuits; optical memory units; integrated photonic circuits in the nature of microchips; semiconductor chips incorporating photonic and electronic components for data processing; neuromorphic computing hardware, namely, photonic integrated circuits and semiconductor chips for neural-network acceleration and high-performance computing; computer hardware comprised primarily of photonic integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, optical modulators in the nature of integrated circuits, and optical data processors for neural network acceleration and high-performance computing; data processors; optical transceivers for photonic computing; all of the foregoing for use in photonic computing, artificial-intelligence inference, machine-learning acceleration, high-performance computing, data-center computing, cloud computing, and neural-network acceleration applications, and expressly excluding goods for educational, instructional, or training purposes and excluding computer hardware, software, sensors, cameras, and electronic control systems for use in or in connection with autonomous driving of motor vehicles, vehicle safety, driver assistance, vehicle navigation, vehicle telemetry, vehicle diagnostics, vehicle infotainment, or vehicle simulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |