Drawing for HAVEN

USPTO serial 99302969

HAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Scott Harders

W. Scott Harders FisherBroyles, LLP600 Superior Ave. E., Suite 1300Cleveland, OH 44114United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software for controlling smart lighting and audio systems; wireless communication devices for controlling smart lighting and audio devices; downloadable mobile applications for controlling smart lighting and audio systems; Smart home automation systems comprising wireless controllers, lighting fixtures, sensors, and audio speakers; electronic controllers for lighting and audio systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance