USPTO serial 99306857
EDGEAI ORCHESTRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGEAI ORCHESTRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vienna, VA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for intelligent orchestration and management of artificial intelligence workloads across distributed computing infrastructure; software platforms for automated and intelligent routing and coordination of AI processing tasks between edge devices, telecommunications towers/satellites, and data centers; downloadable software for managing distributed AI inference pipelines. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for intelligent orchestration of artificial intelligence workloads across distributed computing networks; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for automated management and routing of AI processing tasks; cloud computing services featuring software for coordinating AI inference across edge computing infrastructure; technical consulting services in the field of distributed artificial intelligence orchestration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |