CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MERA

USPTO serial 99307132

MERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin R. Johnson

Benjamin R. Johnson Moore Intellectual Property Law, PLLC13359 N HWY 183, #406-243Austin, TX 78750United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007automated system, namely automated machines, for manufacturing textiles using adhesivesACTIVE—
024textile fabrics for use in the automated manufacture of apparel using adhesivesACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shirts and undergarments, made using an automated system using adhesivesACTIVE—
035business consulting services related to automated material handling related to apparel manufacturing using adhesives.ACTIVE—
040custom manufacturing of textiles for others using an automated system for manufacturing using adhesivesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance