USPTO serial 99313225
LEOSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with LEOSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Agostino
Joseph Agostino Greenberg Traurig, LLP500 Campus DriveSuite 400Florham Park, NJ 07932-0677Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for real-time situational awareness, operational intelligence, and incident response for public safety agencies, government organizations, and commercial enterprises; downloadable software for use in integrating and managing live video feeds, geospatial data, sensor inputs, communication tools, and analytics; downloadable software for use in law enforcement for incident command coordination, dispatch and case management, situational monitoring, and digital evidence collection and review, fire/EMS for monitoring emergency notifications, incident response coordination, resource allocation and tracking, and live situational mapping, emergency management operations, critical infrastructure monitoring, private security for surveillance monitoring, incident detection and alerting, access control monitoring, and security operations management, retail risk management, and transportation system oversight; downloadable computer software for secure data sharing, digital evidence storage, and multi-stakeholder collaboration | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in real-time situational awareness, operational coordination, and incident response across public safety, government, and commercial sectors; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for integrating, visualizing, and managing live and historical data from multiple sources, namely, video, sensors, communications, and third-party systems; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for secure data sharing, workflow automation, digital evidence management, and data analytics; providing online, non-downloadable software for supporting emergency management operations, critical infrastructure protection, enterprise security operations, transportation monitoring, and retail loss prevention | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |