USPTO serial 99316120
VEHICLEDNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VEHICLEDNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Agostino
Joseph Agostino Greenberg Traurig, LLP500 Campus DriveSuite 400Florham Park, NJ 07932-0677Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for vehicle identification, classification, and analysis using artificial intelligence and machine learning; downloadable software for extracting and comparing vehicle features from images and video, namely, vehicle size, shape, lighting, panel design, and other distinguishing attributes; downloadable software for identifying vehicle make, model, and unique characteristics in the absence of a visible license plate; downloadable software for forensic investigations for analyzing video and image data to identify, track, and compare vehicles across multiple data sources for investigative and evidentiary purposes, security analytics for analyzing vehicle-related data and imagery to detect patterns, identify suspicious activity, and generate alerts and reports for security and surveillance operations, commercial fleet monitoring, insurance claims assessment, and traffic management; downloadable software for comparing live or recorded vehicle imagery to known vehicle profiles for tracking or investigative purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for identifying and classifying vehicles using artificial intelligence, computer vision, and machine learning; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for vehicle feature extraction, vehicle make and model recognition, and forensic comparison of vehicles captured in images and video; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in law enforcement, government, insurance, transportation, security, and commercial sectors for real-time and historical vehicle identification; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for integrating computer systems with video surveillance systems, automated license plate readers (ALPR), and other external data sources to enable advanced vehicle-specific searches and analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |