Drawing for FLOUR CHILD

USPTO serial 99321101

FLOUR CHILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOUR CHILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Saam

Daniel Saam CopyMark Law Group, LLC543 Brier Street110Kenilworth, IL 60043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of meats, poultry, fish, fruits and vegetables and cheese; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with pizza-flavored fillings; Cookies; Biscotti; QuichesACTIVEOct 5, 2019
040Custom manufacturing of baked goods in the nature of dough, bread, biscotti, cookies, kolaches for othersACTIVEFeb 6, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance