USPTO serial 99322305
ATOMIC GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEENAN, CAYLA FAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATOMIC GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy D. Gross
Roy D. Gross The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC19 Old Kings Hwy SSuite 200Darien, CT 06820Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable game software for use on mobile devices; Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing on-line computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Providing information on-line relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games; Providing an Internet website portal featuring entertainment news and information specifically in the field of mobile games; Provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |