USPTO serial 99323355
BOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Roseville, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Bolmarcich
Gene Bolmarcich LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH107 North Lake Shore DriveBrookfield, CT 06804United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Custom design and engineering of industrial control systems; Custom design and engineering of industrial control systems comprising programmable logic controllers (PLCs), sensors, safety devices, I/O modules, and cabling, with integrated AI based software tools for bill of materials (BOM) creation, schematic design, code generation, system simulation, and management of the overall workflow; Custom design of machinery; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of industrial control systems; Consulting in the field of engineering; Consulting services in the field of industrial engineering; Consulting services in the field of design and development of engineering processes; Consulting in the field of industrial control systems engineering; Product development consulting in the field of industrial control systems; Software development and product development consulting in the field of industrial control systems; Technology consultation in the field of industrial control systems; Technological consultation in the field of selecting components of an industrial control system suitable for their intended uses; Design and development of intelligence (AI) software for electrical schematic design for industrial applications, electrical circuit design and optimization, and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) code conversion; Design, development, and implementation of software for industrial automation; Design, development, and implementation of software for real-time control of industrial workflows; Custom design and engineering of industrial control panels | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |