USPTO serial 99327572
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Temecula, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
Catherine J. Holland KNOBBE,MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial planning and investment advisory services; Brokerage services in the field of securities and commodities investing; Financial portfolio management; Financial planning for retirement; Advisory services relating to mutual funds; Private placements of hedge funds, private equity funds, securities and derivatives for others; Annuity brokerage services; Financial wealth management services; Insurance consultation; Life insurance brokerage | ACTIVE | Apr 7, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |