USPTO serial 99328631
AIGENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIGENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN A RICHARDS
STEVEN A RICHARDS REESE RICHARDS, PLLC3731 W 10400 SSuite 102-448South Jordan, UT 84009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing, and promotional services for others; Business consulting services in the field of marketing strategies, campaign management, and lead generation; Development and implementation of marketing campaigns for others; Providing marketing consultation and advice regarding brand development, online presence, and customer acquisition; Business data analysis in the field of marketing campaign performance; Digital marketing strategy services; Consulting services for optimizing online advertising and promotional activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating, launching, managing, and optimizing websites and digital marketing campaigns; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that utilizes artificial intelligence for generating marketing content, analyzing marketing performance data, and automating campaign optimization; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for integrating and managing marketing channels, customer leads, and online advertising; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for website creation, digital advertising, and campaign analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |