Drawing for HUNGRY HABIBI

USPTO serial 99331225

HUNGRY HABIBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUNGRY HABIBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sadeer Farjo

Sadeer Farjo Farjo Law, PLLC,1120 E. Long Lake DrSuite 250Troy, MI 48085

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant; Restaurant services; Take-out restaurant servicesACTIVEDec 1, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 11, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance