USPTO serial 99331408
VQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEISS,DANIEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Sobelman
Howard Sobelman Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Portable vehicle seats, portable vehicle seat cushions, portable vehicle seat pads and portable fitted vehicle seat covers with wellness features, namely, heating functions, cooling functions, massage functions, USB chargers, aromatherapy, arm rests, and neck support; modular vehicle seat kits comprised primarily of wellness devices, heating devices, cooling devices, massage devices, USB chargers, aromatherapy devices, arm rests, and neck supports to convert or retrofit existing vehicle seats with wellness features, namely, heating functions, cooling functions, massage functions, USB chargers, aromatherapy, arm rests, and neck support | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |