USPTO serial 99331575
BIAP BIOCOMPATIBLE INKS FOR ADVANCED 3D PRINTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIAP BIOCOMPATIBLE INKS FOR ADVANCED 3D PRINTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Markos
Michael Markos LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.1580 W. El Camino Real, Suite 10Mountain View, CA 94040United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed photopolymer resins for use in three-dimensional printing | ACTIVE | May 22, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |