USPTO serial 99333260
SANDMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANDMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weatherford, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L Johnson
Joseph L Johnson Avek IP, LLC7285 W 132nd StreetSuite 340Overland Park, KS 66213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Sales and leasing of wellsite proppant management systems, dust-free sand delivery systems, frac sand transloading equipment and related equipment for hydraulic fracturing operations. | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2025 |
| 042 | Providing proppant management consulting services, engineering services, mobilization, installation, field maintenance for hydraulic fracturing operations. | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |