USPTO serial 99336221
WATCHTOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, KAREINE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATCHTOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAJESH VIKRAM FOTEDAR
RAJESH VIKRAM FOTEDAR COGNITION IP50 California Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for defining and enforcing quality performance criterion for chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring quality of performance of chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring of chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants during simulation of conversations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enforcing quality performance standards on customer service chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enforcing accuracy performance standards on customer service chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for simulating conversation through electronic messaging via customer service chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents, and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for simulating conversation through simulated voice conversation via customer service chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual assistants; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring quality of performance of chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents and virtual for simulating conversation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for defining and enforcing quality performance criterion for chatbots, artificially intelligent (AI) agents, and virtual assistants, and for simulating conversation via online or in-app chat, email, voice, text messaging and social media messaging communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |