USPTO serial 99336556
CALL 4 HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWAY, TATIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CALL 4 HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delray Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
Julianne B. Bochinski Law Office of Julianne B. BochinskiPO Box 2723Westport, CT 06880United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management of telephone call centers for others; Operation of telephone call centers for others; Appointment scheduling services; Computerized management of medical records and files; Telephone order-taking services for others; Managed care services, namely, electronic processing of health care information; Telephone answering service | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2005 |
| 042 | Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for the managed care process from healthy fitness to disease management and clinical triage services; Maintenance of computer software used for clinical decision support, and clinical triage services | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |