USPTO serial 99336949
SEMIANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMANN, ROBIN R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with SEMIANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Crawfordville, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Breanna Moe
Breanna Moe LZ Legal Services, LLC2828 N. Central Ave, PMB #1510Phoenix, AZ 85004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Expert evaluations and reports relating to business matters; Preparing business reports; Business evaluation of financial, operational, technical, geopolitical, and environmental factors within the semiconductor industry and artificial intelligence (AI) applications for use in semiconductors; Market analysis; Market research; Business consulting services | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2021 |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring topics in the fields of semiconductor fabrication essentials, cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) models, software, and infrastructure related to semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI); Online publication of blogs; Publishing of electronic publications | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |