USPTO serial 99339771
AUTONOMOUS REFLECTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTONOMOUS REFLECTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TARA A BRANSCOM
TARA A BRANSCOM THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP3200 Windy Hill Road SE Suite 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for automatically creating and refreshing optimized subsets or aggregates of data based on user query patterns for use in optimizing database query execution performance in the field of database management and data analytics, including database query acceleration, query optimization, and data processing optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SSoftware as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by others for automatically creating and refreshing optimized subsets or aggregates of data based on user query patterns for use in optimizing database query execution performance in the field of database management and data analytics, including database query acceleration, query optimization, and data processing optimization; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use by others for automatically creating and refreshing optimized subsets or aggregates of data based on user query patterns for use in optimizing database query execution performance in the field of database management and data analytics, including database query acceleration, query optimization, and data processing optimization; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for automatically creating and refreshing optimized subsets or aggregates of data based on user query patterns for use in optimizing database query execution performance in the field of database management and data analytics, including database query acceleration, query optimization, and data processing optimization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |