USPTO serial 99340552
101
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 101?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foster City, CA, US
Foster City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Szymon Gurda
903 COMMERCE DRIVESUITE 310Oak Brook, IL 60523Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | video broadcasting of content in the fields of technology and business; audio broadcasting of content in the fields of technology and business | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2020 |
| 041 | Educational content creation, namely, publishing of educational texts in the fields of technology and business; production of podcasts and television programs; Online publication of multimedia content; Organizing and conducting educational events, namely, in-person educational forums in the field of business and technology; Organizing and conducting educational events, namely, online educational forums in the field of business and technology; Publishing of electronic publications; Digital content creation services, namely, production of video podcasts; Digital content creation services, namely, production of audio podcasts; Digital content creation services, namely, production of television programs | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |