USPTO serial 99343326
ALTRUIST NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTRUIST NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Fine jewelry | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |