Drawing for ACASIA

USPTO serial 99343531

ACASIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, MIN KYOUNG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 138

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACASIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE MAE KALLENBACH

2260 Ridge Dr#13Minneapolis, MN 55416

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing online computer games featuring virtual environments in which users can interact for entertainment purposes; Providing online computer games featuring virtual worlds in which users can interact for entertainment purposesABANDONEDMar 14, 2025
042Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line virtual environment for creating virtual three-dimensional experience, joining the virtual community, meeting with friends and business associates, playing games and staking claim with land, houses, cars, boats and a helicopter; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line virtual environment for registered users to participate in a virtual three-dimensional community, engage with friends, family and business associates, play games, manage and upgrade assets from land, houses, business buildings, furnishings, cars, clothing and accessories; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use as an intelligent virtual assistant and for creative tools to enhance the users' digital experience; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for assisting users with information retrieval, task management, content generation, image creation, culinary inspiration, and entertainment through an AI-powered digital companionABANDONEDMar 14, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2026MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 7, 2026ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 6, 2026EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 10, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 18, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 18, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance