USPTO serial 99346055
MYTREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARRISON, EMMA BROOKE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MYTREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Jordan, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex W. Haymond
Alex W. Haymond Thorpe North & Western, LLP8180 S. 700 E. Suite 350Sandy, UT 84070United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Medical alert systems in the nature of personal emergency response systems (PERS) and lone worker alert response systems, namely, electronic transmitters, receivers, and wearable devices for monitoring and transmitting emergency signals to designated responders or emergency services; electronic devices incorporating sensors to detect falls and other medical emergencies and to send electronic alerts that automatically contact emergency services; electronic devices and apparatus for wireless transmission of emergency alerts programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS); communication apparatus for wireless emergency alerts | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 1989 |
| 042 | Design and development of medical alert devices and personal emergency response systems, namely custom engineering of electronic monitoring devices including sensors for emergency detection, fall detection, and location tracking; and product design and development for personal safety and medical alert equipment | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 1989 |
| 045 | Emergency response alarm monitoring services namely, medical alert devices, personal emergency response systems, and lone worker alert systems; remote medical alarm monitoring of individuals' well-being via telecommunication devices; emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, remote monitoring center for notifying caregivers, and dispatching of emergency services or designated responders; and personal security monitoring services, namely, safety surveillance services for lone workers in remote or hazardous environments | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |