Drawing for ARQ

USPTO serial 99348544

ARQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACKO, CINDY JOYCE SAVITR
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Currency exchange services; Financial exchange of digital currency; Financial exchange of cryptocurrency via crypto swapping; ATM banking services; Issuing of debit cards; Debit account services featuring a physical computer readable card; Debit account services featuring a virtual computer readable card; Financial investment brokerage services; Debit account services featuring a computer readable card which features virtual tokenized payment credentials; Electronic funds transfer services; Payment processing services, including credit card, debit card, and ACH transactions in the field of electronic payments; Mobile banking services; Online banking services; Money transmission services, namely electronic transfer of moneyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2026ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 2, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2026PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2026ERTITEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER—
Sep 1, 2026PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Sep 1, 2026APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 24, 2026IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 11, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2026TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 15, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance