USPTO serial 99349817
FUSION-DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with FUSION-DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmers Branch, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez Guerrero
Arturo Perez GuerreroP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Transmission mechanisms for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; Transmissions and replacement parts thereof for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; gearboxes for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; Electric motors for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; Motors for land vehicles; Power train mechanism comprised of clutch, transmission, drive shaft, and differential for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; Drive shafts for motorized land vehicles, namely, automobiles, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles; none of the foregoing for bicycles or stationary exercise bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |