Drawing for ARCHERY CLASH

USPTO serial 99352103

ARCHERY CLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCHERY CLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul C. Llewellyn

Paul C. Llewellyn ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., NWIP DOCKETINGWashington, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable games software; downloadable application software for playing video games, electronic games and computer games; downloadable video game programs; downloadable interactive video game programs; Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable electronic game software; Downloadable interactive game software; Downloadable interactive entertainment software for playing video games; downloadable computer game software for playing games for use on mobile devices; downloadable software and applications for playing video games and electronic games for use with mobile devicesACTIVEAug 8, 2023
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, online electronic games and online video games, organizing online electronic game competitions; Online entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, online electronic games and online video games, organizing online electronic game competitions; Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, online electronic games and online video games; Video game services and electronic games services, namely, providing online video games and organization of electronic game competitions; Organization of electronic game competitions; Providing on-line computer games; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet, namely, providing online video games, and organization of electronic game competitions; Providing online information in the field of computer games entertainmentACTIVEAug 8, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 29, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 9, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 22, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance