USPTO serial 99352345
A ARC TEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKSHOOD, AKEELA MOHAMED
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A ARC TEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Phoenix, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Lawrence
Steven T. Lawrence Milligan Lawless, PC5050 North 40th StreetSuite 200Phoenix, AZ 85018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Architectural design and engineering services | ACTIVE | May 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |