USPTO serial 99358678
DESIGNGPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with DESIGNGPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kameron W. Kramer
Kameron W. Kramer LAW 4 SMALL BUSINESS OF TEXAS, PLLC1846 N Loop 1604 WSuite 205San Antonio, TX 78248Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for interior design; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for room layout, home styling, and living space customization; Providing online non-downloadable software using machine learning for interior design; Providing online non-downloadable software using machine learning for room layout, home styling, and living space customization; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for room layout, home styling, and living space customization; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for interior design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in interior design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for home styling and living space customization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for home styling and living space customization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for interior design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for interior design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for home styling and living space customization | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |