USPTO serial 99365931
WAVETEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACDOUGALL, KIERRA RYNNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVETEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Smith
Michael T. Smith Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 600Vienna, VA 22180United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuits; Integrated circuit chips, namely , electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; Reticle, namely, semiconductor reticle used during semiconductor manufacturing; Semiconductors; Semiconductor chip memories, namely, semiconductor chip sets for use in enabling memory; Integrated circuit board; Wafers being silicon slices for semiconductors; Semiconductor devices; Integrated circuit substrate, namely, semiconductor wafer for use in fabrication of integrated circuits; Silicon chips; Floating-point arithmetic computer chip; Read-only semiconductor memory chip; Circuit boards; Computer memory chips; Semiconductor chips; Transistors, electric | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of semiconductor circuits; Custom manufacture of semiconductor components; Custom manufacture of semiconductor devices; Custom manufacture of semiconductors, memory chips, wafers and integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing product research and development; Research and development of new products for others; Design of integrated circuits; Design of semiconductor chips; Custom design and testing for new product development; Technology consultation services regarding electrical and electronic products, semiconductors, semiconductor systems, wafer and integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |