USPTO serial 99366963
RILEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANRESA, MONICA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RILEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minden, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Goodman
Mark A. Goodman Goodman Law Center, P.C.10775 Double R Blvd #103Reno, NV 89521United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Plumbing services; HVAC contractor services; Installation, maintenance and repair of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems; HVAC duct cleaning services; Plumbing contractor services; Plumbing and gas and water installation; Plumbing maintenance advisory services; Plumbing repair advisory services; Repair of household appliances and of residential heating, plumbing, air conditioning, and electrical systems; Contractor services, namely, review of and remedial recommendations for building plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems for others; Maintenance of plumbing; Installation of plumbing systems; Plumbing; Installation of plumbing; Advisory services relating to the repair of plumbing; Advisory services relating to the installation of plumbing; Advisory services relating to the maintenance of plumbing; Plumbing installation advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |