USPTO serial 99367566
AIOPTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIOPTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Swernofsky
Steven Swernofsky Los Altos Law3616 Far West Blvd.Ste. 117-245Austin, TX 78731Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sun glasses; Eye glasses; Reading glasses; Field-glasses; Anti-glare glasses; Smart glasses; Optical glasses; Children's eye glasses; Glasses for sports; Virtual reality glasses; Augmented reality glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical diagnostic services; Medical services in the field of migraines, photophobia, neuro-ophthalmic disorder, or other medical conditions of the eyes and brain; Medical assistance services provided via telecommunication and global computer networks for individuals with health problems through the use of wearable medical devices with automated alert and monitoring capacity; Interactive medical monitoring and alert service for reminding clients of medicinal dosage, allergic sensitivity, and prescription refills for medical treatment purposes; Medical diagnostic testing, monitoring and reporting services; Providing on-line medical record analysis services designed to provide patients with custom tailored information about the range of possible diagnoses and therapies associated with a defined set of symptoms; Medical analysis services relating to the treatment of patients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |