USPTO serial 99368783
AETHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AETHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Dresden
Matthew Dresden Dresden Law PLLC2400 NW 80th St., Suite 211Seattle, WA 98117United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Household cleaning and laundry robots with artificial intelligence; Automatic vacuum cleaners; Electric vacuum cleaners; Electric window cleaning equipment; Electrically operated curtain drawing devices; Automatic floor scrubbers; Automatic swimming pool sweepers; Robotic cleaning machines; Electric household cleaning appliances; Electric household apparatus for shampooing floors; Electric household apparatus for vacuuming floors; Electric polishing machines for household purposes; Electric steam mops for household purposes; Electric suction cleaning apparatus for household use; Robotic filling machines; Robotic swimming pool cleaning machines; Robotic vacuum cleaners; Robots for cleaning; Curtain drawing devices, electrically operated; Motorised operating rods for curtains; Electric floor sweepers; Rechargeable sweepers; Electric cordless sweepers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Alarm devices, other than for vehicles; Smoke alarms; Fire alarms; Theft prevention installations, electric; Burglar alarms; Closed circuit television apparatus; Smoke detectors; Access control and alarm monitoring systems; Electronic access control systems for interlocking doors; Access control cards, encoded or magnetic; Encoded key cards; Digital video recorders; Webcams; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Locks, electric; Remote control locking apparatus; Fingerprint door locks; Digital door locks; Biometric locks; Smart locks; Magnifying peepholes for doors; Computer software; Computer hardware; Biometric retinal scanners; Operating systems for personal robots; Water meters; Electric meters; Downloadable mobile applications; Computer application software for smartphones; Intercom apparatus; electric door bells; Data conversion apparatus; Electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |