USPTO serial 99370293
TOMAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Gratz
Michael J. Gratz Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N. Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data for business data analytics and user behavior analytics; downloadable artificial intelligence computer software for deep learning, machine learning, and computer vision; downloadable computer software and mobile application software to train computers to predict user behaviour in the field of machine learning models and artificial intelligence; downloadable software applications using artificial intelligence to assist in project management; downloadable software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of Big Data; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for daily task management and business process automation in the fields of retail, hospitality, logistics, and enterprise services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence consultancy being technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; computer technology consultation in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence; design and development of computer software development tools in the field of artificial intelligence; providing online non-downloadable software that uses artificial intelligence to understand general and pre-defined user queries and formulate responses; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of Big Data; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; software as a service (SaaS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of Big Data for business data analytics and user behavior analytics; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software utilizing artificial intelligence to assist in project management; consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; design and development of computer software that uses artificial intelligence for supply chain logistics; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software that uses artificial intelligence for use in database management for the e-commerce, wholesale and retail industries; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that uses artificial intelligence for use in enterprise content management, enterprise content integration and business records management. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |