USPTO serial 99377400
BRAIN CELLS AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAIN CELLS AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ewa Beach, HI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alison M. Caless
Alison M. Caless Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in creating and managing inventions, computer hardware, and AI systems comprised of recorded algorithms; Downloadable artificial intelligence software for use in creating and managing inventions; neural network-based software platforms for use in modeling neuron models; Downloadable software for creating and managing records and data relating to inventions; downloadable quantum computing platforms for use in performing quantum calculations; Data vaults and encryption tools, namely electronic encryption units; Patent automation systems comprised of computer hardware and downloadable computer software for use in creating and managing inventions; Smart devices integrated with AI, namely , helmets and protective sports equipment; downloadable software for use in patent analytics and legal document formatting | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business and licensing services, namely commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others and business consulting; Technology commercialization being new product commercialization services in the field of technology; Business consultancy relating to patents and AI; Data management services for inventions, namely compiling indexes of information | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, namely training in the field of innovation; AI training tools for patent drafting and innovation; Courses and materials on invention methodology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms featuring information in the field of invention methodology; Scientific and technological services, namely scientific research; AI-based scientific research and providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; Innovation and patent generation search engines for the Internet; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for invention, design, and documentation of inventions; Cloud computing and data storage, namely cloud storage services for electronic data related to AI; Trade secret vault systems; Design and development of computer software for machine learning and consultancy in the field of quantum computing | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brain Cells LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BRAIN CELLS AI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |