USPTO serial 99378062
LOBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARQUET-HORNBACK, ELENA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pejman Yedidsion
Pejman Yedidsion Command IP LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Eighth FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Unmanned, electric propulsion driven, ground controlled or autonomous, GPS-enabled, fixed wing, highly maneuverable, small size airplanes that weigh less than five pounds, with payload for modular devices including video and multiple types of warheads, marketed for low altitude flight use; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Small, lethal, loitering warhead munition that can be transported as a modular device by an unmanned aerial vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |