USPTO serial 99378890
PAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 660Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASON, JARED MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Bruce Miller
Michael Bruce Miller Miller Law LA11611 Montana Ave.Suite 202Los Angeles, CA 90049Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for use by a consumer of an Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled coaching service by way of an avatar providing video communication and chat by way of a web based technology platform and APP providing answers to questions in the field of dating and relationships | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2025 |
| 041 | Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled coaching services for consumers by way of an avatar providing video communication and chat by way of a web based technology platform and APP providing answers to questions in the field of dating and relationships | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2025 |
| 042 | Providing a web hosting platform for (and APP) consumer services by way of an artificial intelligence (AI) enabled avatar through video conversations and typed chat answers to questions in the areas of dating and relationship coaching | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |